Hyderabad, April 6 :K. Kavitha, a prominent leader of the BRS (B. Ramulu’s party), has raised objections to the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) plea seeking permission to interrogate her in Tihar Jail in connection with the ongoing excise policy case. Kavitha’s opposition comes amidst escalating tensions surrounding the investigation into alleged irregularities in the state’s excise policy.
The excise policy case has garnered significant attention in recent weeks, with allegations of corruption and malpractice swirling around several political figures and government officials. As part of its investigation, the CBI has sought to question K. Kavitha, who has emerged as a key figure in the probe.
In response to the CBI’s request, K. Kavitha has vehemently opposed the prospect of being interrogated in Tihar Jail, citing concerns regarding her safety and rights as a political leader. She has argued that such a move would be a blatant violation of due process and an attempt to intimidate her into submission.
Kavitha’s opposition to the CBI’s plea underscores the heightened tensions surrounding the excise policy case and the broader political implications it carries. As a prominent leader of the BRS, Kavitha’s involvement in the investigation has raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about the extent of her role in the alleged irregularities.
Meanwhile, supporters of K. Kavitha have rallied behind her, decrying what they perceive as a politically motivated witch-hunt aimed at tarnishing her reputation and undermining her influence within the party. They have called for transparency and fairness in the investigation, urging authorities to uphold the principles of justice and accountability.
On the other hand, critics of Kavitha and the BRS have seized upon the developments in the excise policy case as evidence of widespread corruption and mismanagement within the party’s ranks. They have called for swift and decisive action to root out corruption and ensure accountability among those responsible for the alleged wrongdoing.
As the legal battle surrounding the excise policy case intensifies, all eyes are on the judiciary to adjudicate the matter impartially and uphold the rule of law. The outcome of the investigation and subsequent legal proceedings will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the political landscape in the region, shaping public perception and electoral dynamics in the run-up to future elections.
